Table of Contents
Step 1: Objectives of the analysis
· Who are we?
· Who is Oxford Industries, Inc.?
· Why do they need the funds?
· What are the main goals for Oxford Industries, Inc.?
Step 2: The firm’s industry
· The Global Economy vs. The U.S. Economy
Step 3: Knowledge of firm and quality of management
· How well does the firm seem to be run?
· Are they taking advantage of opportunity?
· Are they innovative, forward thinking, etc.?
Step 4a: Evaluation of financial statements
Step 4b: Oxford Industry: View from Global Bank Inc
Step 5: Summary
References
Step 1: Objectives of the analysis
Who are we?
We are creditors for Global Bank, Inc., and we are responding to the request of Oxford Industries, Inc., for a very large investment loan. So, in order to make an informed decision as to whether or not it would be in our best interest to grant them the loan, we took the time to evaluate their company, and their financial standings, and we are here to report to you our findings.
Who is Oxford Industries, Inc.?
Oxford Industries, Inc. is an international apparel design, sourcing, and manufacturing company that was founded in 1942 and is based out of Atlanta, Georgia with over 4,800 employees worldwide. Their net sales for the fiscal year, 2007 was $1,128,907 and as an international apparel design company, they sale their apparel designs both domestically and internationally. As a sourcing and manufacturing company, Oxford Industries, Inc., uses third party buying agents that are located in Hong Kong to manage the production and sourcing of its leading product line, Tommy Bahama and, its global product line, Ben Sherman. They also have a third party buying agent in Europe, and other locations, but their concentration for manufacturing is located in Asia.
According to their website, Oxford Industries, Incorporated “…distribute(s) their products through several wholesale distribution channels including national chains, department stores, mass merchants, specialty stores, specialty catalog retailers and Internet retailers.” Their company is comprised of four distinct life style clothing brands: Tommy Bahama, Ben Sherman, Lanier Clothes, and Oxford Apparel. A few brief details about each are:
1. Tommy Bahama is a line of clothing that embraces an elegant tropical paradise feel and targets consumers, both men and women 35 years and older, who “…embrace a relaxed and casual approach to daily living” and have high amounts of income at their disposal and stable fashion preferences. The Tommy Bahama apparel consists of fabrics made of silk, linen, tencel, cotton, or blends which include a combination of one or more of these fiber types.
2. Ben Sherman is an “edgy” lifestyle brand that was acquired in 2004 and consists of apparel and footwear that targets youthful-thinking men and women between the ages of 19 to 35. Its operations are headquartered in London, England. The Ben Sherman apparel line is made from several fabric types including cotton, wool or other natural fibers, synthetics, or a combination of any one of these fabric types and with over 90 suppliers worldwide, the Ben Sherman products are produced on an order-by-order basis. Products are sold via Internet, certain department stores, a variety of independent specialty stores, and Ben Sherman retail stores.
3. Lanier Clothes consists of branded and private labeled apparel for men. The Lanier Clothes products are sold under trademarks that include: Nautica, Kenneth Cole, Dockers, Oscar de la Renta, O Oscar, and Geoffrey Beene, which are licensed to Oxford Industries, Inc., through third parties. The Lanier Clothes products are sold nationally throughout the United States by some of the largest retailers including: Macy’s, JCPenney’s, Sears, Men’s Wearhouse and Nordstrom. The product line is manufactured from a variety of fibers including wool, silk, bamboo, linen, cotton, and other natural fibers, along with synthetics, and a blend of these materials.
4. Oxford Apparel products are designed at the Oxford Apparel offices located in New York. They are designed for consumers of many tastes. The product line consists of branded and private labeled clothing ranging from dress shirts, suited separates, sport shirts, dress slacks, casual slacks to outerwear, sweaters, jeans, swimwear, westernwear, and golf apparel. Oxford Apparel is sold through some of the largest retailers in the United States including: Sears, Men’s Wearhouse, Costco, Walmart, and Macy’s. These five retailers represented 50% of the net sales of Oxford Apparel for the fiscal year, 2007. Oxford Apparel is manufactured from fibers including cotton, linen, wool, silk and other natural fibers, synthetics, and a blend of these materials.
Why do they need the funds?
Oxford Industries, Inc., is interested in borrowing funds from Global Bank, Inc., in order to create new lines for expansion that will appeal to customers on a global scale and increase their customer base both inside and outside of the U.S. Happy with the success from 2007 where they transformed themselves from being a “predominantly private label manufacturer into a lifestyle brand marketer,” Oxford believes that their best growth opportunities are yet to come. So, this is why they are interested in borrowing funds, through an investment loan, from Global Bank, Inc., in order to expand.
With the money, they are anticipating, for the fiscal year, 2008, to open an additional five to ten Tommy Bahama retail stores. They are estimating that each store will cost approximately $1.1 – $5.9 million to build. They also plan to launch the ecommerce of their Tommy Bahama products on their tommybahama.com website so products can be sold directly from the Internet. Just as well, during fiscal year, 2008, Oxford Industries, Inc., is expecting to open five additional stores for the Ben Sherman brand. And, they are estimating that each retail store will cost $0.7 million to build.
What are the main goals for Oxford Industries, Inc.?
The main goals for Oxford Industries, Inc. are:
– To develop a strong, loyal customer base. They believe that if their products can create an emotional connection with their target customers, it will draw them to purchase their life style brands therefore, resulting in higher profits.
–“Create new value for [their] customers and shareholders alike” by continuing to refocus their efforts in those areas that meet their criteria for generating profits and long-term growth.
– Streamline their focuses in order to improve their fiscal performance for 2008so they can have strong returns on their invested capital.
Step 2: Study the firm’s industry
The primary industry which Oxford operates in is the fashion apparel industry where it is very fragmented and competitive, both domestically and internationally. Currently, there is no one single apparel firm dominating the industry, either domestically or internationally. However, at this time, consumers seem to be favoring foreign-based retailers a little more than American retailers, not just because of the failing U.S. economy which has caused U.S. sales to decline but, because consumers are desiring trendy and fresh apparel that is affordable and made with quality as opposed to boring and predictable apparel. Right now, foreign-based apparel retailers have what consumer’s tastes and preferences are demanding versus what American retailers are offering. Therefore, “as a result, most of the fashion apparel store growth in 2008 will come from international firms, especially chains that focus on affordable prices and rapidly changing inventories” (www.printthis.clickability.com).
· The Global Economy vs. The U.S. Economy:
“Prior to globalization, the United States dominated the global economy” however, due to the rise of industrialization and technology, the U.S. share of the global economy has now shrunk to approximately 25% (www.en.wikipedia.org). So, of course, what happens with the U.S. economy affects the global economy but not as much as times past.
Now, thanks to the Internet, apparel retailing through ecommerce is on the rise and, at the same time, countries such as China, Turkey, and the European Union are also enjoying gains in the apparel and textile industry.
Still, most consumers spending are strongly influenced by the “overall economic conditions that affect [both the United States and the rest of the world. So, domestically and internationally, the global economy, as well as, the U.S. economy both have an impact on]…employment levels, energy costs, interest rates, tax rates, personal debt levels and stock market volatility” however, in regards to U.S. manufacturers, their products continue to suffer a long period of decline versus the gains that are being made with foreign-based manufactures (www.oxfordinc.com).
With that said, a number of economists fear that the U.S. economy has been on the verge of its first recession since 2001 [due to]…the housing market’s collapse, a credit crisis, and galloping energy prices [that] are crimping spending and investing (www.iht.com). Also, according to Joseph Stiglitz, a noble-winning economist, he says that “the Iraq war has [also] contributed to the U.S. economic slowdown and is impeding an economic recovery” (Trotta, D.).
To acknowledge the economies downturn, in a recent press release dated February 6, 2008, J. Hicks Lanier, the Chairman and CEO of Oxford Industries, Inc., said,
“We expect that the current economic issues, both in the United States and the rest of the world, will continue to impact our business at wholesale and retail [and, even though] over the years we have seen our share of economic downturns [,] we are confident that our team is well prepared to weather this environment through conservative planning and careful, prudent inventory management.”
Step 3: Develop knowledge of firm and quality of management
· How well does the firm seem to be run?
· Are they taking advantage of opportunity?
· Are they innovative, forward thinking, etc.?
The senior management and Board of Directors at Oxford Inc. are filled with experienced business men in the clothing and retailing industries. Led by J. Hicks Lanier, Chairman of the Board and CEO, the Oxford team has diversified their holdings to fill high end niche markets taking advantage of current trends and strategic acquisitions.
CEO since 1981, Mr. Lanier was also President of the company since 1977 and serves on the board of several other companies. Under his guidance, Oxford Inc acquired Viewpoint International Inc, owner of the Tommy Bahamas clothing line, in 2003 which has become core to the operations and profitability of the company. Showing great foresight into that high end market, Oxford has seen a year over year increase in revenue and of 13.7%.
The company has also created a solid set of operating principles which hinge on, according to their website (http://www.oxfordinc.com/AU_SO.asp), “compelling, high value added products” and “customer driven service”. I believe that they have a core transformation strategy which will inevitably move their company away from being a private label manufacturer to becoming a lifestyle brand marketer. This is mostly customer driven as their lifestyle brands have been their greatest source of growth over the last several years. Their lifestyle brands, both Tommy Bahama and Ben Sherman, have grown with increased distribution through third party high end retailers like Macy’s and Nordstrom in the United States. Meanwhile, their private label brands like Oxford shirts and Lanier clothing has helped to stabilize profits during this transition and continue to perform steadily in the face of increased pressure from ongoing consolidation in the retail industry.

Growth had also been seen in the wholesale distribution category by creating compelling sub brands to fill gaps in their target market. Including, see chart below, footwear, furnishings, tailored clothes, and sportswear. Oxford and its leaders have also created a diversified business model allowing multiple revenue streams and multiple distribution channels. This will help build in revenue assurance in the long run as a diversified portfolio can lead to greater growth and stability over time as the company can take advantage of certain strategic alliances and develop quicker in identified growth segments.

One strategy that seems to work well for them is the diversification of operations based on brand and product its customer segments. They not only manage and manufacture their own products, but they also manufacture goods under other brands that they do not directly manage. This helps cut back office operations cost and still keep profits rolling in; especially with the high end brands they sell. Their strategic acquisition or 3 smaller companies (Tommy Bahama 2003, Ben Sherman 2004, Womenswear group 2006) has led to growth in retail and margin on products. One specific strategic shift they took advantage of was closure of manufacturing plants in Latin America leaning more heavily on 3rd parties manufacturing lessening the impact of breakage and other cost associated with manufacturing of goods. This has led them to decrease their COGS from 61.1% in 2006 to 60.3% in 2007 in turn helping their gross profits.
Step 4a: Evaluation of financial statements:
Oxford Industries Inc.
Ratio Analysis
Fiscal Years ended June 01 2007, June 02 2006, & June 03 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/1/2007 |
6/2/2006 |
6/3/2005 |
|
|
|
—————– |
—————– |
—————– |
| Overall Performance Measures: |
|
|
|
|
|
Price/earnings ratio |
|
15.59 |
10.36 |
14.06 |
|
Return on assets |
|
7.36% |
9.83% |
7.62% |
|
Return on invested capital |
|
8.73% |
12.34% |
9.96% |
|
Return on shareholders’ equity |
|
11.56% |
17.68% |
16.42% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Profitability Measures: |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin percentage |
|
39.66% |
38.92% |
33.36% |
|
Profit margin |
|
4.62% |
6.35% |
3.79% |
|
Earnings per share (net) (basic) |
|
$2.95 |
$4.03 |
$2.97 |
|
Cash realization |
|
1.69 |
1.44 |
1.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Investment Utilization: |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset turnover |
|
1.24 |
1.25 |
1.45 |
|
Invested capital turnover |
|
1.47 |
1.57 |
1.89 |
|
Equity turnover |
|
2.50 |
2.78 |
4.33 |
|
Capital intensity |
|
12.93 |
15.06 |
20.19 |
|
Days’ cash |
|
12.73 |
3.78 |
1.91 |
|
Days’ receivables |
|
44.63 |
46.83 |
54.76 |
|
Days’ inventory |
|
73.59 |
66.59 |
70.59 |
|
Inventory turnover |
|
4.96 |
5.48 |
5.17 |
|
Working capital turnover |
|
5.89 |
6.26 |
7.26 |
|
Current ratio |
|
2.35 |
1.98 |
1.85 |
|
Quick ratio |
|
1.23 |
0.85 |
0.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Financial Condition: |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial leverage |
|
2.02 |
2.22 |
2.98 |
|
Debt/equity |
|
101.52% |
122.12% |
198.48% |
|
Debt/capitalization |
|
41.15% |
43.47% |
56.23% |
|
Times interest earned |
|
4.54 |
4.09 |
3.59 |
|
Cash flow/debt |
|
44.12% |
50.68% |
17.86% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dividend Policy: |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
1.44% |
1.36% |
1.22% |
|
Dividend payout |
|
22.52% |
14.05% |
17.09% |
Oxford Industries Inc.
Ratio Analysis
Fiscal Years ended June 01 2007, June 02 2006, & June 03 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/1/2007 |
6/2/2006 |
6/3/2005 |
|
|
|
—————– |
—————– |
—————– |
| Actual numbers used for ratio calculation: |
|
|
|
|
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
Market price per share |
|
$45.98 |
$41.77 |
$41.75 |
|
Dividends per common share |
|
$0.66 |
$0.57 |
$0.51 |
|
Net earnings |
|
$52,137 |
$70,471 |
$49,827 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
$22,214 |
$23,971 |
$29,147 |
|
Tax rate |
|
33.46% |
30.94% |
34.07% |
|
Total assets |
|
$908,738 |
$885,595 |
$905,877 |
|
Net income + Int (1 – Tax rate) |
|
$66,918 |
$87,025 |
$69,044 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
$315,349 |
$306,575 |
$389,927 |
|
Total shareholders’ equity |
|
$450,945 |
$398,701 |
$303,501 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
$142,444 |
$180,319 |
$212,449 |
|
Total invested capital |
|
$766,294 |
$705,276 |
$693,428 |
|
Net sales |
|
$1,128,907 |
$1,109,116 |
$1,313,609 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
$681,147 |
$677,429 |
$875,355 |
|
Gross profit |
|
$447,760 |
$431,687 |
$438,254 |
|
Cash from operations (incl. discontinued) |
|
$87,922 |
$101,372 |
$51,637 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment (net) |
|
$87,323 |
$73,663 |
$65,051 |
|
Total expenses |
|
$1,076,770 |
$1,038,645 |
$1,263,782 |
|
Total non-cash expenses |
|
$19,517 |
$26,553 |
$22,242 |
|
Total cash expenses |
|
$1,057,253 |
$1,012,092 |
$1,241,540 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$36,882 |
$10,479 |
$6,499 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$138,035 |
$142,297 |
$197,094 |
|
Inventory |
|
$137,333 |
$123,594 |
$169,296 |
|
Total current assets |
|
$334,241 |
$357,581 |
$393,395 |
|
Working capital |
|
$191,797 |
$177,262 |
$180,946 |
|
Monetary current assets |
|
$174,917 |
$152,776 |
$203,593 |
|
Operating income |
|
$100,847 |
$98,116 |
$104,727 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$199,294 |
$200,023 |
$289,123 |
|
Dividends |
|
$11,741 |
$9,899 |
$8,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(http://w3.lexisnexis.com.proxy.cityu.edu/dossier/companyreporting/contentfs.do? prod=CD&host=Rosetta_US_Academic&cdcomp=6_T95038097&reportKey=financial_report)
(http://quicktake.morningstar.com/StockNet/StockReturns.aspx?Country=USA&Symbol=OXM)
Oxford Industries Inc.
Common-size Balance Sheet
Fiscal Years ended June 01 2007, June 02 2006, & June 03 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/1/2007 |
6/2/2006 |
6/3/2005 |
| Assets: |
|
—————– |
—————– |
—————– |
|
Cash and Equivalents |
|
4.06% |
1.18% |
0.72% |
|
Marketable Securities |
|
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
Inventories |
|
15.11% |
13.96% |
18.69% |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
2.42% |
9.17% |
2.26% |
|
Total Current Assets |
|
36.78% |
40.38% |
43.43% |
|
PP&E |
|
19.71% |
17.96% |
16.69% |
|
Accumulated Depreciation & Depletion |
|
10.10% |
9.65% |
9.50% |
|
Net PP&E |
|
9.61% |
8.32% |
7.18% |
|
Intangibles |
|
25.76% |
26.47% |
46.74% |
|
Other Non-Current Assets |
|
3.37% |
2.33% |
2.65% |
|
Total Non-Current Assets |
|
63.22% |
59.62% |
56.57% |
|
Total Assets |
|
100.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
|
Inventory Valuation Method |
|
LIFO |
LIFO |
LIFO |
| Liabilities: |
|
—————– |
—————– |
—————– |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
9.29% |
11.86% |
11.70% |
|
Short Term Debt |
|
0.04% |
0.01% |
0.38% |
|
Other Current Liabilities |
|
3.46% |
5.46% |
4.54% |
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
15.67% |
20.36% |
23.45% |
|
Long Term Debt |
|
21.93% |
22.59% |
31.92% |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
8.27% |
8.65% |
8.53% |
|
Other Non-Current Liabilities |
|
4.51% |
3.39% |
2.60% |
|
Minority Interest |
|
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
Total Non-Current Liabilities |
|
34.70% |
34.62% |
43.04% |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
50.38% |
54.98% |
66.50% |
| Equity: |
|
—————– |
—————– |
—————– |
|
Preferred Stock Equity |
|
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
Common Stock Equity |
|
49.62% |
45.02% |
33.50% |
|
Common Par |
|
1.96% |
1.99% |
1.86% |
|
Additional Paid in Capital |
|
8.98% |
8.45% |
5.07% |
|
Retained Earnings |
|
37.57% |
33.99% |
26.54% |
|
Treasury Stock |
|
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
Other Equity Adjustments |
|
1.11% |
0.60% |
0.03% |
|
Total Capitalization |
|
71.55% |
67.61% |
65.42% |
|
Total Equity |
|
49.62% |
45.02% |
33.50% |
|
Total Liabilities & Stock Equity |
|
100.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
|
Cash Flow |
|
8.55% |
10.80% |
8.47% |
|
Working Capital |
|
21.11% |
20.02% |
19.97% |
|
Free Cash Flow |
|
3.19% |
6.25% |
-12.76% |
|
Invested Capital |
|
71.55% |
67.61% |
65.42% |
Oxford Industries Inc.
Common-size Income Statement
Fiscal Years ended June 01 2007, June 02 2006, & June 03 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/1/2007 |
6/2/2006 |
6/3/2005 |
| Income Statement: |
|
—————– |
—————– |
—————– |
|
Operating Revenue (Revenue/Sales) |
|
100.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
60.34% |
61.08% |
66.64% |
|
Gross Operating Profit |
|
41.36% |
40.50% |
34.73% |
|
Research & Development |
|
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
Selling, Gen. & Administrative Expense |
|
31.62% |
30.57% |
25.62% |
|
Operating Income b/f Depreciation (EBITDA) |
|
8.90% |
8.85% |
7.97% |
|
Interest Income |
|
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
Other Income, Net |
|
1.46% |
1.19% |
0.92% |
|
Special Income/Charges |
|
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
Total Income Avail for Interest Expense (EBIT) |
|
8.93% |
8.85% |
7.97% |
|
Interest Expense |
|
1.97% |
2.16% |
2.22% |
|
Pre-tax Income (EBT) |
|
6.97% |
6.69% |
5.75% |
|
Income Taxes |
|
2.33% |
2.07% |
1.96% |
|
Minority Interest |
|
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
Net Income from Continuing Operations |
|
4.63% |
4.62% |
3.79% |
|
Net Income from Discontinued Ops. |
|
-0.02% |
1.74% |
0.00% |
|
Net Income from Total Operations |
|
4.62% |
6.35% |
3.79% |
|
Extraordinary Income/Losses |
|
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
Income from Cum. Effect of Acct Chg. |
|
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
Income from Tax Loss |
|
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
Other Gains (Losses) |
|
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
Total Net Income |
|
4.62% |
6.35% |
3.79% |
|
Normalized Income |
|
4.63% |
4.62% |
3.79% |
|
Preferred Dividends |
|
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
|
Basic EPS from Continuing Ops. |
|
$2.96 |
$2.93 |
$2.97 |
|
Basic EPS from Discontinued Ops. |
|
($0.01) |
$1.10 |
$0.00 |
|
Basic EPS from Total Operations |
|
$2.95 |
$4.03 |
$2.97 |
|
Basic EPS, Total |
|
$2.95 |
$4.03 |
$2.97 |
|
Basic Normalized Net Income/Share |
|
$2.96 |
$2.93 |
$2.97 |
|
Diluted EPS fr Continuing Ops. |
|
$2.93 |
$2.88 |
$2.87 |
|
Diluted EPS fr Discontinued Ops. |
|
($0.01) |
$1.08 |
$0.00 |
|
Diluted EPS fr Total Ops. |
|
$2.92 |
$3.96 |
$2.87 |
|
Diluted EPS, Total |
|
$2.92 |
$3.96 |
$2.87 |
|
Diluted Normalized Net Inc/Shr |
|
$2.93 |
$2.88 |
$2.87 |
|
Dividends Paid per Share |
|
$0.63 |
$0.56 |
$0.38 |
(http://w3.lexisnexis.com.proxy.cityu.edu/dossier/companyreporting/contentfs.do?prod=CD&host=Rosetta_US_Academic&cdcomp=6_T95038097&reportKey=financial_report)
Step 4b: Oxford Industry: View from Global Bank Inc
| Apparel (Textile) Industry Analysis & Trends |
| Most trends affecting the apparel and footwear manufacturers today are driven by consumer demand and relate to the size of the various demographic groups and their particular wants, shopping patterns and spending power. Private equity firms are buying up apparel companies along with that there is consolidation among manufacturers entering new markets and product lines.
Demand for apparel remains relatively constant compared with prior years. Because of slow down in US economy, lowering the demand for apparel.
According to “Standard & Poor’s” Apparel industry survey dated May 24, 2007; sales of both apparel and footwear in the US are rising; retail sales of apparel rose 5% in 2006 compared to 4% increase in past 3 years.
Oxford’s (OXM) Analysis
For fiscal year 2008 which ends on January 31, 2009, the Company is projecting net sales of $1.01 billion to $1.06 billion. We expect that the current economic issues, both in the United States and the rest of the world, will continue to impact the business at wholesale and retail. The Company is expecting a decline in first quarter net sales due to number of reasons including economic slowdown, decline in Ben Sherman whole sale, increased marketing spends, additional investments in retails and web sites.
Strengths– Oxford provides retailers and consumers with a wide variety of apparel products and services to suit their individual needs. Oxford’s wholesale customers are found in every major channel of distribution, including national chains, specialty catalogs, mass merchants, department stores, specialty stores and Internet retailers. The Company also operates retail, restaurants and Internet websites for some of its brands.
Weaknesses– Oxford needs to show a high presence in web market. Oxford needs to continue to improve their sourcing and efficiencies, broaden product offerings, and target unfilled niches through a mix of acquisitions, licensing, and brand extensions to give the healthy competition in the market.
Threats- Because the customers are more value conscious and demanding with respect to fashion, apparel firms that sell proprietary labels to growing national chains such as J.C.Penney’s and Kohl’s would be in better position. Mass and national chain channels (J.C. Penney) exhibited the strongest growth at 7.9% and 7.6%, respectively.
The luxury apparel sector remains unaffected by economic conditions and firms such as Polo Ralph Lauren will likely benefit from this trend.
Oxford industry is mature but has to face high competition in the market. Sales are influenced by customer sentiments and disposable income.
Opportunities – Diversifying: The Oxford industry must come up with new designs and product line extensions in order to survive and cope with market competition.
Buying into New Markets: Acquiring another company is a way to eliminate current or potential customers, however, in the global economy, Oxford needs to enter into new potential markets.
Offshore sourcing: In the ongoing push to cut expenses, Oxford can move their production facilities to low cost markets. |
| Liquidity- Oxford’s current ratio has increased in the last 3 years, which shows a good sign in terms of liquidity assessment. Oxford’s primary source of revenue and cash flow is its operating activities in the United States. Liquidity requirements arise from the funding of working capital needs, which include inventory, other operating expenses and accounts receivables, funding of capital expenditures, payment of quarterly dividends, repayment of indebtedness and acquisitions.
As of June, 2007, the accounts receivables were 17.45% compared to the accounts payable at 9.29% and, cash and cash equivalents increased to $36,882 in 2007 compared to $10.479 in 2006.
Profitability– Return of Assets decreased to 7.36% in 2007 from 9.46% in 2006. Similarly Returns of equity went down at 11.56% from 17.68% in 2006.
The profit margin declined to 4.62% from 6.35% in 2006 and EPS was reduced from $4.03 in 2006 to $2.95 in 2007. The net profit margin was slightly lower than the industry while revenue growth was at an average that is better than some of Oxford’s top competitors. |
Industry (Textile- Apparel) Statistics (03/03/08)
|
Apparel Industry |
Oxford |
| Market Capitalization: |
38B |
340 M |
| Price / Earnings: |
21.9 |
8.14 |
| Price / Book: |
5.6 |
0.81 |
| Net Profit Margin : |
4.80% |
4.62% |
| Price To Free Cash Flow : |
90.4 |
30.5 |
| Return on Equity: |
11.00% |
11.10% |
| Total Debt / Equity: |
0.9 |
0.675 |
| Dividend Yield: |
1.50% |
3.4% |
Oxford & Apparel Industry leaders comparison
| Statistic |
Industry Leader |
OXM |
| Market Capitalization |
VFC |
8.34B |
339.28M |
| P/E Ratio |
LULU |
106.32 |
8.14 |
| PEG Ratio |
OXM |
1.68 |
– |
| Revenue Growth (Qtrly YoY) |
LULU |
83.90% |
1.20% |
| EPS Growth (Qtrly YoY) |
LULU |
330.80% |
4.90% |
| Long-Term Growth Rate (5 yr) |
LULU |
42.29% |
12.50% |
| Return on Equity |
HBI |
70.43% |
11.10% |
| Long-Term Debt/Equity |
HBI |
8.089 |
0.675 |
| Dividend Yield (annual) |
SGC |
5.50% |
3.40% |
LULU- Lululemon Athletica
HBI- HanesBrands Inc
SGC – Superior Uniform Grp
Direct Competitor Comparison
|
|
|
Oxford
(OXM) |
HartMarx (HMX) |
Van Heusen
(PVH) |
Polo
(RL) |
Industry |
|
|
Market Cap |
339.28M |
88.39M |
2.06B |
6.33B |
38B |
|
|
# Employees |
4,800 |
3,800 |
5,600 |
14,000 |
160K |
|
|
Q Rev Growth (YoY) |
1.20% |
-7.30% |
22.50% |
11.00% |
14.70% |
|
|
Revenue |
1.09B |
564.87M |
2.40B |
4.67B |
489.03B |
|
|
Gross Margin |
40.53% |
32.00% |
49.14% |
54.00% |
40.11% |
|
|
EBITDA ( |
111.58M |
13.15M |
348.76M |
821.00M |
46.00B |
|
|
Oper Margins |
8.13% |
0.62% |
12.70% |
13.55% |
8.13% |
|
|
Net Income |
46.40M |
-4.18M |
179.74M |
389.50M |
10.14B |
|
|
EPS |
2.597 |
-0.116 |
3.118 |
3.671 |
0.35 |
|
|
P/E Ratio |
8.14 |
N/A |
11.71 |
16.94 |
13.38 |
|
|
PEG (5 yr exp) |
1.68 |
0.7 |
0.75 |
1.18 |
1.03 |
|
|
P/S |
0.32 |
0.16 |
0.9 |
1.43 |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary:
In closing, we here at Global Bank, Inc. believe that Oxford Industries, Inc., would be a good investment of our capital. What we have seen in the past is their ability to grow and acquire smaller brands which help stabilize cash flow and allow focus on growth and long term strategy. Oxford has said that the additional money will be used to shore up one of their main weaknesses, lack of a retail presence which will improve distribution. A point of note, as we enter what looks to be a recession, consumers become more price sensitive. This will lead to overall less spending. We do think, however, that Oxford will not lose as much revenue because they do a very good job of showing their product value to a customer. There are also no comparable substitute brands to compete with Tommy Bahama and Ben Sherman. Oxfords debt to equity ratio is almost at 1 and with high liquidity; we see no issue in their repayment of the full loan amount.
References
Bush, central bank chief see US weathering economic storm; recession not on the
horizon. Retrieved March 2, 2008, from
http://www.iht.com/bin/printfriendly.php?id=10564091.
http://www.hoovers.com/oxford-industries/–ID__11133–/free-co-factsheet.xhtml
Retrieved March 4, 2008 – Oxford’s financials.
http://www.lexisnexis.com.proxy.cityu.edu/us/lnacademic/search/companyDossiersubmit
Form.doRetrieved March 3, 2008 – Company Competitors and Market position.
http://www.mergentonline.com.proxy.cityu.edu/compdetail.asp?company_mer=6347&co
mpany=-1Retrieved March 4, 2008 –Oxford’s financials and key competitors
analysis.
http://www.netadvantage.standardandpoors.com.proxy.cityu.edu/NASApp/NetAdvantage
/simpleSearchRun.do?ControlName=HomePageSearch
Retrieved March 3, 2008 – Industry Statistics.
http://www.portal.euromonitor.com.proxy.cityu.edu
Retrieved March 3, 2008 – Oxford Company Analysis.
Lexisnexis.com. Retrieved March 01, 2008, from
http://w3.lexisnexis.com.proxy.cityu.edu/dossier/companyreporting/contentfs.do?prod=C
D&host=Rosetta_US_Academic&cdcomp=6_T95038097&reportKey=financial_report.
Misonzhnik, Elaine. (2007, December 1). Foreign Intrigue.
Retrieved February 29, 2008, from http://www.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=International+apparel+chain.
Morningstar.com. Retrieved March 01, 2008, from
http://quicktake.morningstar.com/StockNet/StockReturns.aspx?Country=USA&Symbol=OXM.
Oxford Industries, Inc. – Press Release. Retrieved March 4, 2008, from
http://www.oxfordinc.com.
Oxford Industries, Inc. website. Retrieved February 29, 2008, from www.oxfordinc.com.
The Global Economy. – From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved March 2,
2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_economy.
The US Retail Clothing Industry Includes about 40,000 Companies That Operate 80,000
Stores with Combined Annual Revenue of $130 Billion. Retrieved March 3, 2008,
from
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0Ein/is_2006_Feb_27/ai_n16086093/print.
Trotta, Daniel. (2008, March 2). Iraq war hits U.S. economy: Nobel winner. Retrieved
March 2, 2008, from
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080302/us_nm/usa_economy_iraq_dc&printer=1.